- Talk:Jane/@comment-109.81.213.140-20200516154528/@comment-5203179-20200517165217 - Adventure High Wiki

Talk:Jane/@comment-109.81.213.140-20200516154528/@comment-5203179-20200517165217

Discussion page of Jane/@comment-109.81.213.140-20200516154528/@comment-5203179-20200517165217
< Talk:Jane/@comment-109.81.213.140-20200516154528
Revision as of 09:52, 17 May 2020 by imported>Furukawa (Created page with ""Actually, Jane's testimony in Faculty control route IS bad." Your very first thing that you said.  You then say exactly what you did in order to prove this... which proved...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

"Actually, Jane's testimony in Faculty control route IS bad."

Your very first thing that you said. 

You then say exactly what you did in order to prove this... which proved nothing

You're arguing that you're not saying Val gives bad testimony ("Val, Victoria, Molly and Sarah provided bad testimonies.")

I'm explaining exactly how the hell the testimony system works. 

...Which you apparently flatout ignored because you're trying to argue about something completely irrelevant at this point. Whether Jane gives good or bad testimony is not the issue here. The issue is that if it gives Val more trust, it's a good testimony. You have not once shown any proof that Jane gave negative Trust to Val. 

"If more than 60% of your slaves wants to remain your slaves, you get an ending in which you control the town though with alternate dialogue."

Yeah. 

Except you're missing just one TEENY TINY DETAIL.

One I've been pointing out since the beginning.

Any testimony that increases Val's trust is considered Good testimony by the Wiki. Whether or not it makes Drape go "yeah, a lot of people want to remain your slaves" is completely irrelevant to the argument.